Ok, well here is a little compilation of some interesting things about the Gunpowder plot, and the different viewpoints held by people and historians. Here are some basic facts which are held by nearly everyone. They are stated without leading to a sided view or assesement of the situation:

Basic Understanding:

A small group of Catholics, Robert Catesby, Guido (Guy) Fawkes, Thomas Winter, John Wright and Thomas Percy supposedly decided to blow up the King on the State opening of Parliament. They hoped that this would lead to a Catholic King coming to the throne. Guido (Guy) Fawkes was an explosives expert who had served with the Spanish army in the Netherlands.

The group rented a cellar beneath the Houses of Parliament and stored 20 barrels of gunpowder, supplied by Guido Fawkes. The date for the deed was set for November 5th. They recruited others sympathetic to their cause including Francis Tresham whose brother-in-law, Lord Monteagle, was a member of Parliament. Concerned for his brother-in-law’s safety, Tresham sent Monteagle a letter warning him not to attend Parliament on November 5th.

Monteagle alerted the authorities and a search of the Houses of Parliament led to the discovery of Guido Fawkes standing guard over the barrels of gunpowder. He was tortured and revealed the names of the conspirators. Catesby and Percy and two others were killed without arrest, and the others were tried for treason and executed.

Ok, now that we see the basics of what happened, (or supposedly happened), lets take a look at the classic Protestant intepretation of such an event.

Protestant Belief:

The conspirators were hatching a plot to blow up the King and parliament.

Robert Catesby, Guido (Guy) Fawkes, Thomas Winter, John Wright and Thomas Percy were known to be Catholics.

Guido Fawkes was an explosives expert. He had only recently returned to England maybe specifically to set the explosives.

Francis Tresham was only thinking of his brother-in-law’s safety when he sent the letter.

Gunpowder was not normally kept in the cellars under the Houses of Parliament. It was obviously put there by the conspirators.

Guido Fawkes revealed the names of the conspirators.

Now, seeing this Protestant understanding of the plot, we may think it correct, since after all, the Catholics and Protestants were at odds with one another in England. But let’s take another look at the situation:

Catholic Belief

Many historians today agree with the Catholics of the time that the Gunpowder Plot conspirators were framed by James I’s chief minister, Robert Cecil.

Cecil hated the Catholics and wanted to show them to be against the country. It is believed that Francis Tresham, who sent the warning note to his brother-in-law, may have been working for Cecil. There is evidence to support this view:

Cecil is quoted as saying ‘..we cannot hope to have good government while large numbers of people (Catholics) go around obeying foreign rulers (The Pope).’ This shows how much he hated the Catholics and wanted rid of them.

Lord Monteagle received the warning letter at night. The night he received it was the only night in 1605 that he stayed at home. Could he have been waiting for it?

All available supplies of gunpowder were kept in the Tower of London.

The cellar was rented to the conspirators by a close friend of Robert Cecil.

All of the conspirators were executed except one - Francis Tresham.

The signature on Guy Fawkes’ confession did not match his normal signature.

I personally side with the Catholic Belief. Not simply because I am Catholic, but because, in taking in the side of things concerning the prejudice and hatred for the Papacy, it seems all the more believable that a few men who truly hated the Church would figure a way to put it into negative favor. A similar case would be that of the burning of Rome which Nero blamed upon the Early Christians. If it was done once, I cannot see why it couldn’t have been done again. There are some questions about the Gunpowder Plot which remain unanswered. Was Guy Fawkes truly a conspirator? Were the Catholics who were executed framed? We may never know, for in the years between now and then, distortion of history has clouded our once clear understanding of the past.