Tolkien and Mortality
June 19, 2008
This is a complimentary post which I felt nearly obliged to write after read through 3/4 of the Silmarillion. (Yes, I’ve finally gotten around to reading it!
) The Silmarillion has been one of the most difficult attempts in my reading history, it is so deep, so profound, and has so many…names.
The work basically recounts the history of Middle-earth, beginning with the creation of Arda, and the two Trees of Valinor, ending with the downfall of Numenor, and the coming of Elendil unto Middle-earth. Tolkien explores the concept of death rather delicately, declaring death, in itself, a gift of Eru Iluvitar to the race of men. A gift in the essence that unlike the Elves who were created to live in the world, and be part of it for all eternity, men may leave it after a time, going into the fulfillment of hte plans of Iluvitar. (No one actually knows what Eru had in store for men after death.)
But getting down to the basics, towards the end of the Silmarillion, we see men becoming close allies with the elves, and reaching a high state of power and honor. In gaining their power and wealth, they begin to grow envious of the elves, and their gift/curse of immortality. To understand how Death is a gift, we must look at the immortality of the elves. Immoratility is only desired by those who wish to cling onto this life, whether it be for gold, power, pleasure, or the like. The Elves were a kindred who necessarily did not indulge in such things, yet were still prone to their snares. The elves lived their lives attached to the fate of this world, only dying by the hands of their foes, or by deep and irreversible grief. Now, Eru deigned that the elves be part of the world which came into being, and thus must live immortally as part of it. Men came into being by unknown craft, allowed a generous portion of years of life, yet, after that time, were to be called out of this world, into the reward of the afterlife. This doesn’t sound altogether that bad, for rather than living in weariness of this world, men were offered an escape. But in building their Kingdoms, men longed not for the gift after death, but rather envied the elves, in desire of retaining their possessions and wealth ever long. This became their downfall, as the men of Numenor, corrupted by Sauron’s lies and deceit, decided to sail West unto Aman, to claim immortality for themselves. (Being thus blinded by the lies of the Dark Lord.)
In its basic concept, we can see the resemblance between this and Even in the Garden. Satan (Sauron) tempted Eve through lies and deceit, promising Forbidden Knowledge if she were to partake of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. (”Forbidden” as the serpent puts it, saying that God wished to deceive Adam and Eve.) Sauron uses the same tactics to turn the race of Men against that of the Elves. Battle ensues, and Eru Iluvitar orders our justice as he sees fit. Though this is a rather choppy post, it sums up the moral of the story. Though death is a punishment for sin, it is also a gift. For if we live our lives according to God’s Law, then we shall meet Him in the Everlasting Bliss to come.
June 19, 2008 at 10:10 PM
I’ve always loved how Tolkien deals with the downside of immortality in the Silmarillion. I think many people miss that part of the book…but it really is an intriguing look at the subject. (The other great fiction book on immortality being, of course, “Tuck Everlasting.”)
Glad you posted on it!
(And don’t worry, the last part of the Silmarillion is the easiest to get through!)
June 20, 2008 at 12:54 PM
I know! It’s so interesting the way he addresses things!!!
I noticed the latter part of the Silmarillion was easier to get through, but there are so many names…
June 20, 2008 at 5:18 PM
Well, that’s Tolkien for you! Exciting, Profound, Religious and Name crazy. But the amount of names does give you a wonderful database to fall back on when you are searching for a Middle-Earthish name and don’t want to translate a new one.
Great post btw. I have read the Simarillion about.. three times, and I always appreciated how he showed that immortality isn’t always the great thing you think it is, how it can actually be a ‘curse’.
June 20, 2008 at 10:32 PM
I don’t recall where…but I think it’s in one of his letters that Tolkien regards the central message of LOTR as being about Death. I thought that was really interesting. He certainly likes to approach the topic from some new perspectives.
Take the ringwraiths, for example. Their immortality is an undeath. A terrible enslavement, more than anything else. And that’s what I like about Tolkien, how he can put another spin on things.
June 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM
True, but I do not like the way Ron “borrowed” so heavily from Wagner’s Ring Trilogy and The Wizard of Oz. For me, he took so many things from these two works that I am constantly reminded of them all the time. He certainly is not not most creative person as everything is just taken from other sources.
Also, most will not even tough the profound racism that Tolkien shares with Wagner. If you cannot detect these things in his work then you are not looking very closely or are in denial. The LOTR is entertaining, but it also bears SEVERE flaws. The hype and commerical interests make sure that you don’t notice them.
June 23, 2008 at 1:15 PM
In agreement here Carpe.
Anonymous,
I haven’t read the The Wizard of Oz nor Wagner’s works, so I can’t say if Tolkien borrowed anything. But on your accusation about racism, I don’t see it in Lord of the Rings or any of Tolkien’s works. If you are going to say its because Orcs are black skinned, get a life. Orcs are supposed to be a disfigurement and perversion of the Elves, an example of pure evil, who can only DO evil. Just like Demons.
In defense of your statement on racism, may I point out that actually, there are plenty examples of the many races actually working together? Dwarves, Elves, and Men, allying themselves together to fight the great evil!
June 23, 2008 at 6:29 PM
Anonymous,
Excuse me here, but how likely do you think it is that Tolkien actually read the Wizard of Oz? Where is your proof? What did he “borrow”, hmm?
[...]He certainly is not not most creative person as everything is just taken from other sources[...]
Not the most creative person? Have you ever seen the languages he has created, at least in part? Read of the world and the history of the world that he crafted?
And a racist? Really, I have to agree with Master Xavier there, get a life. In case you did not know, Tolkien was a very devout Catholic. Now, that may not sound as a very good defense, but if you are a devout Catholic, it is pretty much a given that you are not racist. If you are, then you are not a devout Catholic then are you?
Severe flaws? Name them, please.
July 10, 2008 at 8:25 PM
Wasn’t the Wizard of Oz written after LOTR? (I haven’t read it since I was 10 or so, so I wouldn’t remember)
So, Anonymous, Tolkien is “racist” because he doesn’t show the orcs is a good light? Well, I don’t see any possible way he could have written the books with the orcs shown in a good light, unless he had them all “convert” and help the Elves (yeah right), and made Sauron have to create a whole new breed of orcs. But wait–then there would still be orcs shown in a bad light. Whoops.
Unless you meant he was being racist as in, he showed Sauron in a bad light? Now that is something to consider
July 16, 2008 at 11:28 AM
I have to say that I love The Silmarillion. I first read it in High School and re-read it every few years or so…but then I am a major fan of the LOTR Trillogy. I just re-read The Silmarillion and have always been struck by the fact that Sauron is certainly demonic, but was not the “Boss”…that was Morgoth. Very complicated mythology, with resemblance to our Human/Catholic heritage…but not strictly analogous. When I first read the LOTR (as a young teen), I thought that the Elves were similar to Angels (immortality), but of course, there is no correlation. As for racism…oh crud…that is just silly. I’ve never read the Ring Cycle, but The Wizzard of Oz? Tolkien was telling Middle Earth stories to his children and writing them down LONG before he could have read L. Frank Baum’s writings. Similarity of structure (the quest theme) does not imply ANYTHING. I’d think that Beowulf would have been a greater influence on JRRT.
I am glad that Christopher Tolkien has continued to publish what he can of his father’s unfinished writings. It is difficult, as JRR had several versions of some of these tales in the works for YEARS!
Looking forward to the Hobbit movies.
Blessings all, EJT
September 29, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Hey guys,
I read your post and i could not stop myself from replying. I really love lotr and silmarillion( sry for misspell).
I totally agree with you guys what you said about the anonymous. Honestly that guy is a COWARD. Yeah that’s right anonymus. He just comes in here to put water on all tolkien works? He was probably some messed up guy who did not really pay attention to all the detail of lotr. i have read all teh books probably 4 times. I am sure there are elves, dwarves in other books, i wonder if he meant that tolkien “borrowed’ them and used them from other sources. If that’s what he means than that’s plain stupid. Elves and dwarves been in many stories. I cant really say much more than this. Sorry if i used any bad language but i was really mad at the anonymus guy.
March 19, 2009 at 12:41 AM
[...] Here is a nice post on The Silmarillion from another blog in word press. (Added 19/3/09) [...]
May 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Hello.
I never thuoght I will agree with this opinion, but you knoe… I agree partially now.